Goshen residents warn of fear, negative perception of law enforcement because of detainer policy

Goshen resident Richard Aguirre, left, addresses Sheriff Jeff Siegel and the Elkhart County Council about a new policy that sets a longer immigration hold period at the county jail.

GOSHEN — Middle school teacher Naomi Zook sees a change come over her students whenever immigration concerns are in the news.

The Goshen reading instructor was one of three people who spoke out Saturday against a new policy for holding immigrants in the Elkhart County Jail for up to 72 hours on a federal detainer. They told the Elkhart County Council that it’s unnecessary, opens the county to potential liability and would only sour perceptions of law enforcement in the community.

They asked them to rescind the change or suspend it pending public input and review.

Sheriff Jeff Siegel announced the longer hold earlier in the week, which he said was requested by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. He said he allowed an amendment to the contract with the U.S. Marshals Service to hold no more than two individuals at a time and only up to 24 additional hours on a 48-hour detainer, which keeps them in jail so they can potentially be picked up by ICE.

After hearing the comments Saturday, Siegel and Council President John Letherman said that county officials will have discussions on the policy and may rescind or revise it.

Students’ attitudes

Zook explained that her students are often the sort of kids who are at risk of dropping out and becoming involved in crime, and that their perception of authority is colored by the things they hear around them. She sees their reading scores suffer as well.

“I have been shocked by my students’ attitudes towards law enforcement,” she said. “As statements come out about our sheriffs and our police working with ICE, you can see the attitudes in my classroom change towards authority at school and towards their teachers.”

She said she grew up with a positive perception of law enforcement herself, and that she understands what the sheriff’s department is trying to do. But she also agrees with the assessment of the American Civil Liberties Union, whose Indiana branch criticized Siegel’s decision.

“In the community, it gets blown out as if our sheriffs are out to get us, our police are out to get us,” Zook said. “I agree with the ACLU, that our local enforcement needs to come out of policing whether somebody is undocumented or not. So we can protect our communities, so we can protect our kids, so we can have better relationships with our communities, so we can stop crime at a local level. And I think that’s what the county needs to enforce first.”

Potential liability

Fellow Goshen residents Richard Aguirre and Marilyn Torres also spoke against the policy change. Both were part of efforts to oppose the plan for an immigration detention facility in Elkhart County in 2018.

Torres shared more about the ACLU’s response to the policy, which warned that greater coordination with ICE by local law enforcement would foster more fear and less cooperation among residents. The organization also warned that imprisoning people without due process and often without probable cause or pending charges exposes local governments to the risk and liability of holding a person in violation of the Fourth Amendment.

That’s already happened in many communities, Aguirre noted. He pointed out that the city of Marysville, Washington, recently agreed to pay $85,000 to a Mexican immigrant who was held on detainers twice, despite court orders that he be released. 

“ICE has a terrible record of maintaining accurate databases about who is deportable. In many cases, people who have legal status or who are actually U.S. citizens have been detained, because they were supposedly deportable,” he said. “These kinds of false arrests and detentions have led to successful lawsuits against local jurisdictions, and the federal government is not responsible for those kinds of abuses. Local jurisdictions are.”

He later shared a statement from Lisa Koop, associate director of legal services for the National Immigrant Justice Center in Goshen, warning that the county could be on the hook for “significant financial liability” if litigation is filed over civil rights violations.

“The county’s detention contract is just a basis for reimbursement of detention costs. It does not authorize the detention itself,” she said. “Unless ICE personally processes the noncitizen into ICE custody, the person remains unlawfully in Elkhart Sheriff custody.”

Aguirre also told the council that a policy allowing a longer hold is unnecessary because the detainer requested by ICE already excludes weekends and holidays from the 48-hour limit. 

He said the policy risks too much, for little benefit. 

“Local authorities do not enforce immigration law, they should not be asking about immigration status. And that is happened, and that is happening,” he said. “I’m afraid this new policy will increase negative perceptions among Latinos about the Elkhart County Sheriff’s Department. Already there is a high level of distrust and fear among Latinos because of rumors that the Sheriff’s Office is working hand-in-hand with federal immigration authorities. That cannot have been the intent of the new policy, but that is the unfortunate result.”

‘No witch hunt’

In announcing the policy change, Siegel said he doesn’t intend to hold detainees for ICE on a long-term basis and won’t allow the jail to exceed the stated agreement. He also said his officers won’t be actively seeking people based on their immigration status.

“There is no witch hunt,” he said Saturday. “However, once I saw my name in the same sentence with ACLU, I must protect myself, my agency and this county. So in conferring with attorneys, I’m not gonna make any further statements.”

But he did address the chance of reversing the policy change.

“If the county attorney advises, we’ll rescind,” Siegel said. “If not, then we’ll see if we can meet on common ground.”

Letherman indicated some discussions will be held on the policy change and that they’ll try to strike a balance.

Aguirre said after the meeting that he looks forward to a talk with the sheriff. He noted that several people, including Goshen Mayor Jeremy Stutsman, have asked for an explanation of the new policy.

Letherman also said he doesn’t believe Latino residents of Elkhart County should fear that law enforcement is after them.

“There is no anti-immigration going on in Elkhart County. We know a huge number of the folks who have made this county successful are Latinos. They work hard, they do a good job,” he said. “People who have businesses here, particularly people that have manufacturing businesses, consistently tell us that without the Latino population, they wouldn’t have a company.”

(10) comments

Joe King

I bet the below comments are all Trump supporters too.....scared and fearful...And cue the hateful and bigoted comments in 3...2...1....go!


The above four comments are spot on. Why do I not hear of programs to help those that snuck in to pay a fine and become legal citizens? All I hear is, "shhhh, we don't want to upset them. It may hamper their lifestyle." I have worked with several people who have legally joined our country and it made them feel great! A crime is a crime is a crime. Doesn't matter if you littered, robbed a bank, killed someone, or are here illegally. Why does our government not do something to help? Instead, so many of them seem to be wasting tax dollars and lining their own pockets.


Oliver! You can't buy citizenship. It's a process. You must go through this process at all steps THEN you are allowed to test. If you pass the test you become a naturalized citizen!


I didn't say they could buy it, only pay a fine to help offset the cost of them being here. Seems like that would be the least that could be done. No handout. I know quite well how the immigration system works thank you very much.

Revolution 1776

Which holds more weight with the sheriff .

Mr Aguirre's plea or the CR 18 incident.?

Revolution 1776

If the children don't respect authority they will get no respect as adults . How leniant is only holding 2 at a time. Should be tougher


Maybe Mr Aguirre and friends need to school the "latino" population on the actual immigration laws. If you are here legally, you have nothing to fear. If you don't break the laws of this country, this state, this county or city, you have no fear. Police departments have no time to go door to door and arrest. I was actually arrested and booked 1 time in my life. Illegal possession of fireworks! Why? Because I threw a cherry bomb out of a car. Where? On Franklin st.. in front of the old PD. Whose fault? Not EPD! Dumb me! Your chances of a bad experience with police, almost nil! Do not break the law! Do not pass GO! And do not collect $200!


Some teacher. Why isn't she sharing the information with her students that if people are here legally - I repeat, Legally - then they have nothing to worry about. If they did not enter the United States through legal paperwork, they are already breaking our laws and should be treated as criminals. I totally commend the Sheriff's Department for cooperating with ICE. I'd rather my taxes were contributing the the expenses of keeping the illegals in jail and awaiting pickup as opposed to my taxes paying for their housing, food, medical, clothing and schooling for the children. Granted, this is the Land of the Free ... but you can't expect everything to be handed to you for free.


As usual, the article left off one important word: ILLEGAL. It should read "...A new policy for holding illegal immigrants..."


It seems that our left wing school educators are disturbed that people who have violated our laws may be feeling insecure. If you come here illegally, thus violating the law, you are a criminal and should feel insecure. Instead of painting our law enforcement officers as evil doers, maybe they should teach their students how law enforcement protects the citizens of our country from criminals who take advantage of them. Why would you complain about one law enforcement agency helping another (unless they are violating the Constitution), which they are not. The sheriff’s department is doing what it should do and the county officials should back them up instead of crawling under their desks every time they get complaints from activists who are trying to erode our country’s laws.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.